- Category
- Life in Ukraine
Violent Clashes at Ukraine’s National Guard Facility Near Kyiv, Explained
A confrontation outside a National Guard facility near Kyiv on November 2 sparked allegations of mistreatment and a criminal investigation, while Ukrainian military officials warned that Russia was trying to exploit the unrest.
Prefer U24 Media on Google
- Authors
![Photo of Roman Kohanets]( "Photo of Roman Kohanets")
-111f0e5095e02c02446ffed57bfb0ab1.jpeg "Photo of Roman Kohanets")
UPD: Ukraine’s Interior Minister Ivan Vyhovsky dismissed allegations of torture chambers and deaths at the National Guard facility in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka as false. Vyhovsky said the confrontation showed signs of a preplanned provocation aimed at removing servicemen from military custody. According to the minister, a woman who presented herself as a medical worker used an ambulance and emergency service symbols to attract public attention and amplify the allegations. Authorities have detained the woman and are continuing their investigation.
A confrontation outside a National Guard facility near Kyiv on November 2 prompted allegations of mistreatment, claims of outside interference, and an official investigation into the incident.
Clashes broke out outside a National Guard facility near Kyiv on November 2 after allegations of illegal detention and torture spread online, prompting a criminal investigation, Ukraine's State Bureau of Investigation (DBR) announced on November 3.
We bring you stories from the ground. Your support keeps our team in the field.
The confrontation took place in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka, a village outside the Ukrainian capital. A crowd gathered after reports claimed the facility was illegally holding approximately 40 people inside a private house.
Kyrylo Budanov, head of the Presidential Office, arrived on the evening of November 2. He called the situation unacceptable, claimed that people could not access hospital care, and urged the relevant authorities to establish what had happened.
What was the National Guard facility used for?
The 1st Azov Corps said Military Unit 3121 used the building as a temporary deployment site. Newly mobilized servicemen stayed there while officials processed their documents before sending them to training centers. The site also held servicemen who returned after leaving their units without authorization.
Oleksandr Pivnenko, the commander of the National Guard of Ukraine, told hromadske that personnel at the site processed the documents of mobilized men before sending them to training centers.
-74e27e09e312d1639f24e75f6233ccd5.png)
What is known about the allegations of mistreatment?
Slidstvo.Info also spoke with veteran Maksym Onufriienko, who visited the building and said he saw no places of torture. Claims of severe physical injury, medical complications, financial extortion, a fatality, and systemic abuse remain unverified.
The outlet also established that a 14-year-old boy, who appeared in widely circulated footage wrapped in a thermal blanket, had climbed over the fence after the confrontation began. He was not among the detained mobilized servicemen.
Francis Farrell, a senior reporter at The Kyiv Independent, said the 14-year-old boy later seen leaving the facility in apparent shock had been throwing bricks during the confrontation. According to Farrell, people repeatedly handed the boy bricks, which he then threw. Farrell said he filmed the incident himself and confirmed that no minors were being held at the facility.
This, by the way, is the kid who was later led out looking shocked. People kept handing him bricks and he kept throwing them. No minors were being held there. This is my video. pic.twitter.com/TiETFrTLux
— Francis Farrell (@francisjfarrell) November 3, 2026
Hromadske separately reported that a mother of a mobilized man entered the facility and told the outlet that the men she saw were fine, but conditions were terrible.
The National Guard confirmed there were no fatalities and said it would provide details of the injuries after medical examinations.
Who is investigating the incident?
Military Ombudsman Olha Reshetylova stated that her representatives were working at the scene with the National Guard command. She added that the servicemen were safe and receiving medical care. Interior Minister Ivan Vyhivskyi ordered an internal inquiry into the conditions at the facility, separate from the bureau's criminal case.
What have officials said about possible interference?
On November 3, Budanov said that unspecified actors had influenced the events in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka. He pledged to identify and punish those responsible for organizing the unrest and said Ukraine's security agencies would conduct internal reviews. Budanov confirmed that prosecutors and relevant authorities had already launched an investigation, emphasizing that no one has the right to act unlawfully.
Ukrainian authorities detained the woman who arrived at the National Guard facility in an ambulance, Presidential Office chief Kyrylo Budanov confirmed to TSN on November 3. According to Budanov, she had inspected the facility at least three days earlier and communicated with Telegram channels that later spread the allegations. Investigators are still examining her motives.
Azov commander Denys Prokopenko stated in a video that the information situation around the conflict benefits Russia and discredits the military.
Ukraine’s General Staff warned on November 3 that Russia was attempting to exploit domestic conflicts to undermine public trust in Ukraine’s Defense Forces. It urged the public to refrain from spreading unverified accusations or discrediting servicemen before investigators establish the facts. The General Staff emphasized that authorities must investigate potential military misconduct while protecting servicemen from unlawful actions, threats, and unfounded allegations.
In a separate assessment, Ukraine’s Center for Countering Disinformation said the November 2 confrontation in Petropavlivska Borshchahivka showed signs of a preplanned information campaign involving external interference. According to the center, Russian propaganda outlets and pro-Russian commentators sought to turn public anger against Ukraine’s Defense Forces and authorities. The first call to gather outside the facility appeared on Threads at 11:34 a.m., followed by allegations that approximately 40 people were being held in a basement. Russian propaganda outlets began spreading the story at 1:57 p.m.
The center identified 361 Facebook posts repeating nearly identical allegations about illegal detention and denied medical assistance. By around 7 p.m., 110 Russian channels had circulated similar narratives describing the facility as a "concentration camp" and portraying the confrontation as a revolt against Ukrainian military authorities. The center recorded 13,958 publications generating approximately 52.83 million views. Its assessment highlighted coordinated information activity but did not establish that Russian actors had organized the confrontation itself.
Discuss this article:
-77ed6c5d3800d459d130683888d464d4.jpg "Russia Struck Their School, but These Ukrainian Kids Still Show Up for Class")
